Answer 1=There is frequent discrimination during the job selection process among the individuals on the basis of their appearance. It is a widely known fact that the candidates with good appearance already have 20% benefits over the average looking individuals. This is a very serious problem in the job situation as the candidate is not selected on the basis of his or her skills or capabilities but just for her or his looks, The same goes for the attractive professors as despite having average teaching style, her looks can receive greater and better feedback than the professor having average look but very good teaching style. This does not provide the correct feedback
Answer 2= I do not agree with the statement Any individual should not be evaluated on the basis of her looks, The basis of evaluation must be the performance, her ability, and intellectual power. Although there is no doubt that beautiful faces attract but a beautiful mind is what the organization looks to get success.
Answer 3= there are certain industries such as aviation, hotel, and play and movies and so on where the looks are important to represent the company or the organization. The better looks appeal to the common people of the customers and it creates a soft image and completive advantage for the organization.
This is true for all the three categories as these jobs need to appeal and convince the other individuals and looks can make this process easy
Answer 4= The argument for the law can be that any sort of discrimination among the individual is illegal even if it is on the basis of the appearance. All the individuals must be evaluated on the basis of the same parameters.
The arguments against the law will be that looks always matters and attracts. It is a natural process to get attracted to beauty and to be with the beautiful people. So if a person is given preferences on the basis of her looks there is no harm.
Answer 5= Treatment should be based on eligibility criteria, objective based selection process and asper the laws in place. It will help select the right candidate . For example, during job interviews and selection process, all the candidates should be given fair, equal and objective based opportunities where their abilities should be judged, rather their facial expression will give them preference. So, the argument, mentioned is mot correct.
To bring diversity in the workforce or in other aspects, the entities should go to those areas from where, they could get the best possible potential candidates or reach out to those media channels, web platforms that are accessed by these communities. Once they come with the application and pass through the selection process, then they should get selected. It prevents bias, adds diversity and help organization gets best talents as well.
Though, the organization can opt for the affirmative action to have few seat, reserved for those who are perennial sufferers in their lives and their communities are not able to support them. Under this specific program, few individuals can be absorbed despite their level of abilities to make them and their communities to progress. But, it should only be for few seats.