Why does Windows XP zero pages?
What will be an ideal response?
Windows XP zeroes pages to prevent a process that is allocated a page frame from
reading the (potentially sensitive) information that another process previously stored in that
frame.
You might also like to view...
If X is a pointer variable, then the location assigned by the compiler for X is its (L-value, R-value, signature) ______.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
A thread gains access to a resource with a nonempty discretionary access control list (DACL) if ________.
a) the first ACE (access control entry) in the resource's DACL that matches one of the SIDs in the thread's access token grants that security principal access to the resource b) no ACE in the resource's DACL denies access to any of the SIDs in the thread's access token c) one of the ACEs in the resource's DACL that matches one of the SIDs in the thread's access token grants that security principal access to the resource d) for each SID in the thread's access token, there is an ACE in the resource's DACL that grants access to the resource
When filtering records in a table, the ________ command limits records to only those records that match the value in the selected field
A) Replace B) Find C) Filter By Form D) Selection
Can a process waiting for a spin lock be indefinitely postponed even if all processes guarantee to leave their critical sections after a finite amount of time?Aprocess waiting for a sleep/wakeup lock? If you answered yes, suggest a way to prevent indefinite postponement.
What will be an ideal response?