Imagine that you are responsible for devising and implementing a state prison's employment program and that, in stark contrast to the restrictions and constraints, budgetary and otherwise, faced by most prison administrators, you have been given
broad freedom and adequate resources to establish said program. What would you do? What kinds of programs would you implement? Would you partner with other entities? What kind of evaluation or assessment process would you have?
Answers will vary but should describe types of prison employment programs (vocational, profit-producing, public-service provision) as well as an inmate classification procedure.
Responses may include an explanation on how a balance can be struck between inmate preferences and goals and the needs of the institution, as well as the potential for partnering with other entities such as government agencies or private companies.
You might also like to view...
What is the potential danger of informants being the opposite sex of their control officer/investigator? How can agencies alleviate this potential problem?
What will be an ideal response?
Which statutes are derived from the same punitive atmosphere that led to truth-in-sentencing statutes?
a. habitual offender b. shock incarceration c. split sentences d. victim impact statement
The case of Johnson v. Avery provided inmates with the right to
A) use jailhouse lawyers. B) the free exercise of religion. C) access federal courts. D) petition for habeas corpus.
What if corpus delicti and how does it apply to crime?
What will be an ideal response?