Choose several U.S. Supreme Court decisions that pertain to the right to court-appointed counsel for indigent defendants, and explain the significance of each.
What will be an ideal response?
Gideon v. Wainwright(1963) is the landmark decision where the Supreme Court stated that indigent defendants facing felony prosecution in state courts have a right to appointed counsel. The Supreme Court has further ruled, in the case of Douglas v. California (1963), that indigents have the right to appointed counsel for the first appeal. The Court has wrestled with issues involving the right to counsel in nonfelony criminal prosecutions. The ruling in Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972) limited the right of nonfelony defendants to have court-appointed counsel; however, in the more recent decision rendered in Alabama v. Shelton (2002), the Court ruled that indigents are entitled to a court-appointed attorney even if facing only a suspended jail term for a minor charge.
You might also like to view...
Intramuscular injections are often referred to as skin-popping
a. True b. False
Which of the following is true of Miranda rights requirements?
A. An individual’s Miranda rights must be read before they are arrested. B. An individual’s Miranda rights must be read before they are questioned. C. An individual’s Miranda rights must be read at some point during the police interrogation. D. An individual’s Miranda rights must be read only if they are arrested for a felony.
Split sentence probation is also known as shock probation
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Police agencies themselves are in the best position to know their specific crime problems; thus, they are best equipped to work with researchers to come up with effective solutions, which is the premise of __________.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).