Liesl purchased an insurance policy on her house. The policy stated that the insurance company was not liable for any damage to her house caused by vandalism or burglary. After Liesl's house had been vacant for more than 30 days, an arsonist burned it down. Is the insurance company liable?
a. No, because arson is a form of vandalism.
b. Yes, because arson is not a form of vandalism.
c. No, because the language is ambiguous and should be interpreted against the insurance company.
d. Yes, because the language is vague and should be interpreted against Liesl.
.C
You might also like to view...
If a contract calls for personal services, the death or physical incapacity of the person to perform such services discharges the contract.?
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
On January 1, 20X8, Putter Corporation acquired 40 percent of the voting shares of Shank Company for $65,000. Shank reported net income of $45,000 and paid dividends of $10,000 in 20X8. Putter reported operating income of $50,000 for the year. There is 80 percent exemption of intercompany dividends and the effective tax rate is 35 percent. Assume that the equity method is being used.Based on the preceding information, what would Putter report as income tax expense for the year?
A. $23,800 B. $18,760 C. $17,500 D. $22,540
Which of the following is a security risk associated with BitTorrent?
A) danger caused by opening ports on the firewall B) danger that an employee may download an infected file that cannot be rejected by filtering C) both A and B D) neither A nor B
Whenever the population standard deviation is unknown and the population has a normal or near-normal distribution, which distribution is used in developing an interval estimation?
a. standard distribution b. z distribution c. alpha distribution d. t distribution