What is the scare-off effect, and how does it help incumbents?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: An ideal response will:
1. Define the scare-off effect as the ability of an incumbent to fend off challenges from quality opponents.
2. Explain how the institutional advantages of name recognition, fund-raising, and mailings to constituents serve to discourage opponents from challenging a sitting member of Congress.
You might also like to view...
What conclusion does this chapter make concerning political power?
a. Power is evil for everyone that has it. b. Power is always used for good by good people. c. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. d. Power in itself is neither good nor evil.
Which of the following is most likely to vote for a Democratic candidate?
A) a person who goes bowling B) a person who plays golf on weekends C) a person who lives in the suburbs D) a person who has a relatively high income or is considered to be rich E) a person who belongs to a country club
Oregon has challenged the federal government's attempt to bar doctors from helping patients die.This case is an example of
a. the battle over "states rights" b. the constitutional legality of Oregon voter initiatives c. unitary government in the United States d. constitutional primacy of state power over federal rules
During the uncertain political environment of the 1770s, support for American independence was ______.
a. favorable and strong b. unanimous and assertive c. weak and openly split d. contentious yet hopeful