Discuss Supreme Court rulings since 2010 related to campaign finance. How have these rulings affected the power of individuals, corporations, and unions to shape elections? Do you agree with the Court's decisions? Explain your reasoning
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Summarize the Court's decisions: in 2010, the Supreme Court reversed a long-standing ban on the use of corporate and union general funds for election communications. In 2014, the Supreme Court struck down aggregate limits on how much an individual can contribute to candidates, party committees, or PACs.
2. Evaluate the consequences of these decisions, noting the development of Super PACs since 2010 and the increased spending on campaigns.
3. Draw a conclusion regarding the merits of the Court's decisions. For instance, one might argue that protecting free speech is the most important consideration, regardless of the consequences of the decision. Alternatively, one might argue that these decisions will lead to an increase in unregulated electioneering by corporations and unions and will allow corporations, unions, and wealthy individuals to have disproportionate influence on election outcomes.
You might also like to view...
The early settlements were characterized by
a. a relatively complex division of labor. b. a relatively egalitarian division of tasks. c. a population of hunters and gatherers. d. a lack of political structure.
The following terms are all examples of validity measures: split-half, test-retest, internal consistency and parallel forms
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Civil liberties lawyers choose, from a large number of complaints, a(n) __________ case for their arguments that offers the group its best shot because the violation is so obvious, the damage so great, and the person making the case so appealing.
A. landmark B. test C. injunction D. class action
Which of the following is usually not a recommended course of action for a leader who is trying to be effective?
a. Publicly criticizing those who need to improve b. Preventing “cronyism” and favoritism c. Pulling rank on uncooperative members and threatening reprisals for not following orders d. Dealing fairly, openly, and equitably with all members e. Both A and C