What are civilian review boards, and what are some of the primary arguments for and against their use?
What will be an ideal response?
Civilian review boards are a commonly discussed approach to police accountability. They are designed to provide independent and transparent oversight of policing. These boards vary, however, in terms of their powers to investigate and punish officers. In addition, there are concerns that the boards have preconceived agendas and that the people appointed to the boards might feel obligated to pursue specific objectives.
You might also like to view...
Torture is not allowed as a punishment in the United States, as it has been deemed ___________________________ by the Supreme Court
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The community policing philosophy does not include community residents in decision making
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
_____ and _____ have the lowest juvenile custody rates (81 and 92, respectively)
a. Oregon, Vermont b. Illinois, South Dakota c. Vermont, Hawaii d. Hawaii, South Dakota
Describe the US Supreme Court and explain how a case becomes heard in this court
What will be an ideal response?