Should Britbart’s organization be held accountable for damaging the reputations of the
professors?
What will be an ideal response?
For inciting violent threats against the professors? For using their intellectual
property without permission? For posting their images on YouTube without permission?
Or should the political critic be held guiltless as he was merely exercising his free
speech on the Internet? Defend your answer using philosophical arguments.
You might also like to view...
All dillybobbers are thingamajigs
No whatchamacallit is a dillybobber. Therefore, no whatchamacallits are thingamajigs. This syllogism is an example of a. the four-terms fallacy. b. a syllogism with an undistributed middle term. c. illicit process. d. a valid syllogism.
Why doesn't the Order of Cosmic Engineers allow Digital People to be voting members of its ruling body?
A. Because the anonymity of the Digital People makes them hard to trust B. Because one real person could vote twice by creating two avatars C. Because Digital People are run by computers not human beings D. Because Digital People have united to promote a dangerous political agenda E. Because the Order of Cosmic Engineers is biased in favor of real people.
The "eye for an eye" view of capital punishment is known as the revenge argument
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
“A fan of the Tour of France is reported to have said that Armstrong used performance-boosting drugs. Therefore, he used performance-boosting drugs” commits the fallacy of
A) hasty generalization B) weak analogy C) false cause D) appeal to ignorance E) appeal to unqualified authority