Discuss how a police officer can be held liable civilly, criminally, and administratively at both the federal and state levels of government for the same act. Give examples
What will be an ideal response?
A police officer can be held liable civilly, criminally, and administratively at both the
federal and state levels of government for the same act, if all the elements for
liability are present. For example, an act of an officer that leads to the wrongful
death of a suspect may subject the officer to liability under state and federal laws.
Under each, the officer may be held liable civilly, criminally, and administratively.
The double jeopardy defense does not work in these cases because it applies only if
there are successive prosecutions for the same offense by the same jurisdiction.
You might also like to view...
The term ad _________plea bargaining to refer to some of the strange concessions that defendants agree to make as part of prosecutors? decisions to secure guilty pleas
Fill in the blank with correct word.
Which of the following is least likely to be studied by a victimologist?
A. How someone’s lifestyle increases the risk of victimization B. The effects of mass incarceration on society C. How the police respond to calls of domestic violence D. How the media represent victims of sexual abuse
The Nuremburg Principle supports the view that:
a. counterintelligence programs are necessary to harass and disrupt legitimate political activity. b. one should disobey unjust laws when morality calls for it. c. the “end justifies the means” to serve the public utility. d. “Whistelblowing” is a necessary evil to protect the general public from political corruption.
How can officers safeguard their undercover identity?
What will be an ideal response?