Describe how approaches to enforcement of premarital agreements have evolved and why. What public policies support the various positions?
What will be an ideal response?
Although premarital agreements regarding the disposition of property upon death had been enforced for many years, agreements relating to disposition of property upon divorce were considered per se invalid because they appeared to threaten the institution of marriage by providing a financial incentive for divorce. They were also considered unfair to women who, as "homemakers" were viewed as not capable of negotiating contracts and protecting their interests as well as men who were experienced in the world of work and business dealings. (Reference the Posner case.)The evolution has been from nonenforcement to a traditional fairness approach treating the parties as fiduciaries (reference procedural and substantive fairness and the second look doctrine), to a contractual (unconscionability) approach reflected in the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (page 47 the text).
You might also like to view...
The intermediate scrutiny test is used for cases involving classifications based on the marital status of a person at the time of birth
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
One item that is not an important security measure is?
A. limiting access to stored evidence to prevent a break in the chain of custody.? B. ?redaction of privileged and privacy information. C. ?computer screensavers. D. computer access shut-offs.?
Paper documents may be converted to electronic format by use of:
a. scanners b. drivers c. forms d. fields
Prisons have a right to restrict visits to inmates.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)