Why is it important to distinguish between the material presented in the Results section of a journal article and that in the Discussion section? That is, what different information does each provide?
What will be an ideal response?
The results section gives a complete description of results, but does not provide speculation or discussion. The presentation of results should be an objective description that is relatively free of theoretical bias. The discussion section uses the data to develop interpretations and speculations; it can involve theory and particular points of view that the author wants to advance. The difference between the results and the discussion is that the results are usually fairly clear and are not controversial; the discussion, on the other hand, requires interpretation that goes provides meaning about what the data tell us.
You might also like to view...
"Gentrification" is the term used to describe the movement of wealthy residents and trendy high-end businesses to the suburbs
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
The founding ideology of the BJP in India is ______.
A. secularism B. multiculturalism C. Islamism D. Hindu nationalism
At the end of the 1890s, what reform was seen as a cure for municipal corruptions?
a. Party bosses b. Weak governors c. Strong mayors d. Malapportioned legislatures
Identify the government institutions whose influence on agenda setting has become especially important. Explain.
What will be an ideal response?