Discuss the rule of law and why it is important. Contrast life in a country where the rule of law is enforced with life in a country where it is not and explain how this impacts economic growth.
What will be an ideal response?
The rule of law is a government’s willingness and ability to protect private property rights and enforce contracts. Economic growth is hindered in countries where the rule of law is not enforced. For instance, in a country where the rule of law is enforced, a store can allow its customers to make purchases on credit and feel confident that it can pursue legal remedies if those customers do not pay their bills. In a country where the rule of law is not enforced, stores may not want to extend credit to their customers because they will have a difficult time forcing them to pay it back. Furthermore, citizens of a country without the rule of law may fear that the government may take away their land or businesses and will therefore have greater reluctant to invest than citizens of a country with strong property rights.
You might also like to view...
Property rights allowing individuals to own goods, services, and factors of production are MOST important in
a. socialistic economies. b. planned economies. c. capitalistic economies. d. command economies.
Suppose chickens and beef cattle are produced by different companies on different sites
If bad weather causes an increase in the price of hay, a food eaten by beef cattle but not by chickens, the equilibrium price of beef will ________, and the equilibrium price of chicken will ________. A) stay the same; increase B) increase; decrease C) decrease; increase D) increase; increase E) decrease; decrease
The minimum-cost output is the quantity corresponding to the minimum point of the:
a. marginal cost curve. b. marginal product curve. c. average variable cost curve. d. average total cost curve.
Consider two scenarios for a nation's economic growth. Scenario A has real GDP growing at an average annual rate of 3.5%; scenario B has an average annual growth of 4.5%. The nation's real GDP would double in about:
A. 20 years under scenario A, versus 30 years under scenario B B. 20 years under scenario A, versus 16 years under scenario B C. 12 years under scenario A, versus 16 years under scenario B D. 16 years under scenario A, versus 30 years under scenario B