Whistleblowing is a morally ambiguous activity on a complex concatenation of grounds: It necessarily involves a betrayal of trust on behalf of a public interest which itself is on some occasions morally ambiguous. It indicts otherwise morally competent individuals and organizations concerned with being perceived as legitimate. Sometimes it arouses public opinion, a frequently contaminated process.
What will be an ideal response?
Argument; conclusion: Whistleblowing is a morally ambiguous activity
You might also like to view...
According to Utilitarianism the morally right thing
a. follows God’s will b. promotes my self-interest c. is done out of self-knowledge d. reduces suffering and increases pleasure
A Jina is a person who has conquered rebirth
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Throughout this test, write your answer on the form provided. Erasure marks may cause the grading machine to mark your answer wrong. INSTRUCTIONS: The following selections relate to distinguishing arguments from nonarguments and identifying conclusions. Select the best answer for each. Sugar never spoils or gets moldy because it has an extremely low moisture content. This low moisture content
dehydrates and kills microorganisms that might cause mold, and it impedes chemical changes that could cause spoilage. A) Argument; conclusion: This low moisture content ... that might cause mold. B) Argument; conclusion: Sugar never spoils or gets moldy. C) Argument; conclusion: It impedes chemical changes that could cause spoilage. D) Argument; conclusion: It has an extremely low moisture content. E) Nonargument.
INSTRUCTIONS: Select the answer that best characterizes each argument. Adopt the Aristotelian standpoint. It is false that some leprechauns are not cobblers. Therefore, it is false that no leprechauns are cobblers
A) Valid; existential fallacy. B) Invalid; illicit contrary. C) Valid; no fallacy. D) Invalid; illicit subalternation. E) Invalid; existential fallacy.