What proactive steps could be considered to make it difficult for money laundering to take place?

What will be an ideal response?


Corporations should be required to provide sufficient information to allow investigators to follow money trails with greater ease: Reports should list (1) all corporate officers; (2) all stockholders or other investors; (3) all sources of investment capital, including those emanating from foreign corporations and offshore banks; and (4) all bank accounts, both foreign or domestic. Silent partnerships and fronts should be outlawed.

Existing requirements to report large sums of money transferred between and among banks should be enforced. This should apply to trust accounts, and the following should be reported: the names of everyone who has access to the money, the sources of income in the accounts, and the allocation of withdrawals. Businesses presently excluded from reporting requirements, such as restaurants, bars, and other cash-intensive entities, should be included. Interbank transfers and wire transfers to foreign banks and corporations should be reported.

Foreign currency transactions should be limited and subjected to requirements detailing where the money is going and why. Perhaps the money should be taxed as a way to discourage this practice (a type of preventive financial measure). Certainly, criminal and civil penalties for what are euphemistically called white-collar crimes should be increased drastically. Corporate executives should be licensed by the state, and those convicted of crimes should be barred from participation in public corporations, corporations engaged in interstate commerce, and so on. Surely, if the federal government can justify putting labor union locals into receivership based on the criminal records of their officers, the same should hold for brokerage houses. Independent auditing of all corporations should be mandated. The auditors should be employed by the state and paid for by a state-imposed fee on corporations.

Finally, federal prosecutors (and jurors alike) should recognize that a corrupt organization is a corrupt organization, whether it is the Mafia or a national brokerage firm. The seizure of corporate assets under the RICO Statute for criminal activities in pursuit of racketeering should become as common as the confiscation of a drug dealer's ill-gotten gains.

Criminal Justice

You might also like to view...

The use of victim impact evidence at sentencing has been disapproved by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)

Criminal Justice

Most locks are intrusion-proof and deny access by an unauthorized intruder

a. True b. False

Criminal Justice

What federal agency is responsible for witness security?

A. USMS B. FBI C. DHS D. Secret Service

Criminal Justice

Stan owes George $500 . George decides to confront Stan in person and drives to Stan's home, where he engages Stan in a verbal altercation concerning the money owed

Stan tells George that he does not have any money at the present, but he will pay him next week. George tells Stan he is not leaving until he gets his money. Stan tells George to leave or he will call the police. George stands fast, refusing to leave Stan's property. When the police arrive Stan may ask the police to arrest George based on what charge? a. Illegal entry b. False imprisonment c. False arrest d. Trespass

Criminal Justice