Explain how the Nationwide SAR Initiative works. Who reviews the information? Do you believe this to be a viable system? Explain
What will be an ideal response?
• When an officer encounters activity that might be an indicator of potential terrorism, the officer gathers as much information as possible and forwards it in accordance with individual department procedures.
• The information is first reviewed by an intelligence analyst, and then it goes to a supervisor.
• If the information appears valid, selected portions may be released on a secure computer server outside the agency's own system.
• Two more reviews take place before the information can be accessed.
• First, the local JTTF reviews the data to determine if it threatens any ongoing secret investigation(s).
• This is followed by a review from e-Guardian.
• If both of these reviews are positive, the information can be reviewed by other agencies.
• Any investigator or analyst accessing the information is only able to look at material approved and released by the originating agency.
You might also like to view...
What does Locard's exchange principle state?
a. DNA is individual. b. Fingerprints are individual. c. The victim plays a role in the crime. d. The criminal will leave something behind at the scene.
Knowledge and skills required of hackers to break into systems have:
a. declined. b. remained the same. c. increased. d. doubled.
Matching
1. Who a. Motive 2. What b. Was there a delay in reporting the crime. 3. When c. Requires the officer to identify the persons involved. 4. Where d. What weapon was used. 5. Why e. Location where the crime was committed. 6. How f. What type of offense was committed.
Milgram provided little information in his debriefing to participants in most of his experiments.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)