Which of the following would be considered a distinguishing feature of democracy?
a. Legislation is conducted by a bicameral body.
b. Citizens are allowed to purchase items and services without interference.
c. Individuals can own firearms.
d. People have opportunities to influence the decisions of government.
d
You might also like to view...
Early voting studies found that:
a. persons with high education were more likely to vote than those with low levels. b. those with higher income were less likely to vote than those with lower income. c. in the United States, there was no correlation between income level and voting turnout. d. party affiliation and education level determine who votes.
Which of the following statements is true about the Stamp Act?
A. It imposed a tax on all paper imported into the American colonies. B. It was the second direct tax that the British Parliament imposed on the colonists. C. It was a document prepared by colonial delegates outlining their perceived rights and grievances against the British rule. D. It required that packaged sugar should have the stamp of the British crown. E. It required thatall legal documentsuse specially embossed paper that was to be purchased from the government.
Which of the following institutions does NOT normally act as a watchdog overseeing the actions of bureaucracies?
a. President b. Interest groups c. Congress d. Media e. Political parties
In 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Employment Division v. Smith established what important precedent concerning freedom of religion?
a. The ruling strongly encouraged active religious practice in the United States but was later overturned by legislation. b. The Supreme Court intended to force religious inclusion into the workforce. c. The Supreme Court attempted to create a constitutional amendment that would further strengthen the First Amendment. d. The ruling gave social conservatives an inroad with which to file more lawsuits against the government. e. The ruling required state governments only to establish a “legitimate state interest” in restricting religious freedoms.