What are the four alternatives a project organization can adopt in deciding how to address their risks? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? Which is best and why?
What will be an ideal response?
The four possible alternatives a project organization can adopt in deciding how to address their risks are:
Accept risk — Risks of a minor nature are probably present in a matter of course, but because their likelihood and or consequence are so small, they are deemed acceptable and are worth little to no attention because the expense outweighs the benefit.
Minimize risk — Strategies to minimize risk seek ways to prevent risks from occurring or to minimize impact if they do occur.
Share risk — Risk can be allocated among project members, either subcontractors, or different departments, or between customer and project organization. The risk that is evenly distributed will lessen the burden on any one player, but contracts are best signed up front to minimize the amount of finger-pointing that occurs once the risk is realized.
Transfer risk — Transfer of risk is done contractually; the benefit to the transferring party is that the risk is no longer theirs, although this lightened burden comes at some expense.
The best approach depends on the risk involved and the mindset of the project organization. Minimal risk should be handled with acceptance; more serious risk can be handled with acceptance or some other means depending on the resources the company can bring to bear.
You might also like to view...
If market value is less than cost, the difference between the cost and market value of inventory is considered a loss due to holding inventory and should be reported on the income statement as an expense
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following logical fallacies involves offering evidence such as "everybody knows"?
A) An appeal to popular opinion B) An ad hominem attack C) A false dilemma D) A false analogy E) A red herring
Clean Machines Company makes washing machines. Over the phone, Clean offers to sell Dealers Appliance Outlet one hundred model EZ2000 washers at a price of $150 per unit. Clean says that it will keep the offer open for ninety days. Dealers responds that within two or three weeks it will decide whether to accept. One week later, Clean faxes, and Dealer receives, notice that the offer is withdrawn. Dealer immediately phones Clean to accept the $150-per-unit offer. When Clean refuses to deliver at that price, Dealer files a suit. Clean asserts, first, that there is no contract and, second, that if there is a contract, it is unenforceable. Discuss Clean's assertions.
What will be an ideal response?
Stanley Inc., a calendar year taxpayer, purchased a building and placed it in service on June 12. The MACRS depreciation calculation assumes that the building was placed in service on May 15 (midquarter).
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)