What is judicial activism? How does judicial activism influence the courts?
What will be an ideal response?
Judicial activism is the philosophy of using one's powers as a judge to do more than interpret the Constitution or laws by avoiding precedent and handing down decisions with sweeping implications for the future. A judicially active judge favors "judge-made" law and looks more to the future than the past.
Often activism decisions have broad implications and may have sweeping and general language. Kyllo v. United States is an example of judicial activism.
You might also like to view...
Which is the strongest method of citizen input in which a civilian panel investigates, adjudicates, and recommends punishment to the police chief?
a. Internal review b. Civilian review c. Mediation d. Judicial review
Contemporary forms of radical criminology, such as left realism, peacemaking criminology, feminist criminology, and postmodernist criminology, have been principally concerned with which of the following?
a. Explaining individual criminality b. Explaining how capitalism produces crime c. Explaining how crime is conceived of and constituted, and how it should be responded to d. Explaining why crime rates are declining
Hate speech can be difficult to define. The United States, for example, qualifies hate speech as speech ______.
a. that surmounts to an individual or group merely ‘trolling’ the general populous b. which is derogatory in nature but does not promote violence nor creates a hostile environment c. that incites or produces ‘imminent lawless action’, such as direct threats of violence d. within online message boards that is seen as offensive
The questioning of opposing witnesses during trial is examination
What will be an ideal response?