The Supreme Court established the "average person" standard in the case of
a. Roth v. United States.
b. Buckley v. Valeo.
c. Sullivan v. New York Times.
d. Katzenbach v. McClung.
e. Near v. Minnesota
a
You might also like to view...
Which statement best describes special-interest groups' power?
A. The nature of the special-interest group determines whether it is stronger at the state and local level or in Washington, D.C. B. Special-interest groups' power is generally stronger in Washington, D.C. than at the local level. C. Special-interest groups' poweris generally stronger at the state and local level than in Washington, D.C. D. Thanks to campaign reform laws, the strength of special-interest groups has greatly diminished at both the state and local levels and the federal level. E. Special-interest groups have never been particularly powerful in U.S. politics, either at the state, local, or federal level.
This type of theory most closely linked with Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau typically provides an observation on human nature, an observation on problems that arise because of a lack of government, and recommends a best form of government
a. Normative theory b. Empirical theory c. Social contract theory d. Existentialist theory e. Socialist theory
Which of the following chronological sequences of events is correct?
A. Shays's Rebellion; Annapolis Convention; Declaration of Independence B. Declaration of Independence; Stamp Act; Philadelphia Convention C. First Continental Congress; Stamp Act; Articles of Confederation D. Articles of Confederation; Declaration of Independence; Annapolis Convention E. Boston Tea Party; First Continental Congress; Declaration of Independence
The Tea Party movement is important to examine in light of the politics of the American founding because ______.
A. it highlights the tension between government authority and individual rights of citizens B. it shows that people are too apathetic to demonstrate against the government C. militia movements are drafting their own constitutions D. it illustrates the tension between the Second Amendment and the right to free speech