In Certified Fire Protection v. Precision Construction, Precision accepted a winning bid from Certified for it to install a fire suppression sprinkler system. Later the two parties got into a fight over some details in the contract, which was never signed. The courts held that the contract was:

Question

a. properly accepted, so there was a binding contract
b. accepted with minor modifications that were not critical to the intent of the contract, so it was binding c. never formed as there were disagreements over major provisions
d. never formed because Certified was not licensed by the state to do such work
e. none of the other choices

Answer 1

c