What is the problem with using high-level programming languages to represent algorithms?
What will be an ideal response?
As an algorithmic design language, this notation is also seriously flawed. During the initial phases of design, we should be thinking and writing at a highly abstract level. Using a programming language to express our design forces us to deal immediately with detailed language issues, such as punctuation, grammar, and syntax. These technical details clutter our thoughts and at this point in the solution process are totally out of place. When creating algorithms, a programmer should no more worry about semicolons and capitalization than a novelist should worry about typography and cover design when writing the first draft.
You might also like to view...
The arguments to a function are enclosed in:
A) brackets. B) parentheses. C) braces. D) single-quotation marks.
The ________ function is used to count the number of cells containing specified values
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The first line in a business letter that contains the current date, and that is positioned just below the letterhead if a letterhead is used.
What will be an ideal response?
What are some of the reasons why turning off SSID beaconing provides a limited degree of security?
What will be an ideal response?