In Florida v. Bostick, the court concluded that evidence seized during bus sweeps was admissible in court:
A) ?provided that probable cause was first established.
B) ?because the passengers in a bus fall under the same expectations as those in any motor vehicle, as established in Maryland v. Wilson.
C) because a bus may be considered a public place where no expectations of privacy exist.
D) ?provided that consent was given by the person whose belongings were searched.
E) ?once the passengers had purchased their tickets.
D
You might also like to view...
A(n) __________ occurs when a person is wrongfully convicted and later declared not guilty
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Concerning third party consent to search, in which of the following situations can one person consent to a search for the other person? a. A janitor consenting to the search of the employer's premises. b. A school administrator consenting to the search of a guidance counselor's locked desk containingconfidential records
c. A factory owner consenting to a search of items on top of an employee's workbench. d. A landlord consenting to the search of a tenant's apartment.
_______________ is the application of computer technology to find and utilize evidence of cyber crimes
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Each piece of evidence should be photographed a minimum of _____
a. Once b. Twice c. Three times d. Four times