In what ways do traditional parental responsibility statutes differ from vicarious liability? Why do we have vicarious liability statutes? Which do you think functions better: parental responsibility statutes or vicarious liability? Provide an example to support your argument
What will be an ideal response?
Traditional parental responsibility statutes aren't the same as vicarious liability. Parent responsibility statutes are based on parents' acts and omissions; vicarious liability statutes are based on the parent–child relationship. Vicarious liability statutes grew out of public fear, frustration, and anger over juvenile violence and parents' failure to control their kids.
You might also like to view...
A nonreactive method that attempts to make theoretical sense of documents (text or visual) by analyzing their cultural meaning is called ____________
a. qualitative documents analysis b. historical research c. historical-comparative research d. academic legal research e. basic research
Which rapist chooses to enhance their sexual experience symbolically or covertly?
a. Sadistic-overt b. Sadistic-covert c. Non-sadistic/high social-competence d. Non-sadistic/low social-competence
It is helpful for the courts to view issues and practices through the lenses of the ________ model(s)
a. crime control b. due process c. social bond d. crime control and due process
What would the 95% confidence limits for a sample that included 325 individuals with a mean of 8 and a standard deviation of 0.63.
a.(6.765, 9.235) b.(6.931, 9.069) c.(6.267, 9.235) d.(6.267, 9.733)