The powers of the British judicial system to modify or overturn parliamentary legislation are
a. more sweeping than the power of the U.S. court system to modify or overturn congressional legislation.
b. more limited than the U.S. courts’ ability to review congressional legislation.
c. Neither statements (a) nor (b) is true.
d. Both statements (a) and (b) are true.
Answer: b
You might also like to view...
A ______________ is a permanent body established by a house of Congress, while a ______________ is appointed to reconcile difference between two different versions of the same basic bill.
A. standing committee; select committee B. joint committee; conference committee C. select committee; standing committee D. standing committee; conference committee E. conference committee; joint committee
Which of the following countries is NOT a permanent member of the UN Security Council?
A. Germany B. the United Kingdom C. Russia D. China E. France
A recent historical example of chemical weapons being used deliberately against civilians is that of the Iraqi government's attack against Iraqi Sufis in the 1980s
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. Redistributive policies are typically the least controversial and result in little partisan conflict. 2. Sequestration is a process by which Senators can hold budget proposals “hostage” until their demands for earmarks are met. 3. Earmark reform led to the elimination of pork and other earmarks in congressional legislation. 4. Congressional oversight is typically part of the implementation stage of policy-making. 5. Appropriations bills are constitutionally required to start in the House of Representatives.