How would a dissonance theorist explain the paradoxical finding that we are apt to like our adversaries after doing them a favor and to dislike our friends after treating them badly?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: Both findings demonstrate the power of dissonance to alter our attitudes and beliefs to make them less dissonant with our behaviors. It arouses dissonance to do something nice for someone we don't like, so we reduce the dissonance by convincing ourselves that we may like our adversaries more than we initially thought. It also arouses dissonance to do something mean or unkind to someone whom we like. We reduce this dissonance by bringing our attitudes toward our mistreated friends into line with our behavior; in essence, we work to convince ourselves that they are not as likable as we initially thought.
You might also like to view...
The goal of single-subject designs is to demonstrate that the manipulation of a treatment is responsible for causing changes in behavior
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
John Carroll analyzed intelligence test scores from nearly 500 studies and defined _____ independent middle-level abilities.
A) 8 B) 10 C) 12 D) 15
Extinction of a CR involves:
A) repeated presentations of the CS without the US. B) repeated presentations of the US without the CS. C) repeated presentations of the UR alone. D) punishing the organism with an electric shock every time the CR occurs.
A distinction between behavioral and social-cognitive perspectives is that the former emphasizes __________, and the latter emphasizes __________ in learning
a. brain processes; social processes c. introspection; self-determination b. conditioning; development d. reinforcement; observation