In June, 1988, John Simpson granted to his son, D. Bruce Simpson, the right to purchase various parcels of real property that were held initially by John's revocable trust and later by his wife's (Mildred Simpson) revocable trust. The 1988 option agreement provided that Bruce could exercise the option at any time on or before 20 years from the date of the agreement and contained the following
clause: "[i]n consideration for the mutual promises made in this agreement." When some of the properties were transferred to Mildred's trust in 1993, Bruce executed a waiver of the option only to facilitate the transfer of the properties for estate planning purposes, and Mildred executed a written agreement ratifying and incorporating John's 1988 option agreement. John died in 2002, and Mildred died in 2006. The properties were thereafter administered by John's and Mildred's trusts. In April 2008, Bruce exercised the option on several of the parcels. Bruce then died in March 2009. In April 2009, the personal representative of Bruce's estate completed the purchase of the properties. Chris, who is John's other surviving son, filed a petition challenging the validity of the 1988 option agreement because of a lack of consideration with the vague clause. Family members testified that the mutual promises were related to John staying in the area, caring for his parents, and running the family fruit farm because Chris had left home and did not want to run the business. ?Highlands Plaza, Inc, entered into an agreement to purchase property from Viking Investment Corporation. The purchase was conditioned upon Highlands obtaining a $725,000 mortgage on the property. Highlands was able to obtain the $725,000 only through a first and second mortgage with different institutions, but still sought to go through with the sale. Viking refused on the grounds that the financing condition was not met. Highlands has brought suit for specific performance. What is the result?
A)?The contract is rescinded
B)?The contract has been breached by Highland
C)?The contract condition has been satisfied and Viking must perform
D)?The contract is void
C
You might also like to view...
It is going to cost $80,000 a day simply to house and feed a construction crew in the farthest reaches of northern Alaska. This would be an example of a situation requiring reducing the project duration due to
A. Incentive contracts. B. Imposed project deadlines. C. Unforeseen project delays. D. High overhead. E. Time to market.
The use of prototype stores, standardized merchandise lines, and cooperative advertising give product/trademark franchisees similar advantages to chains
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
After signing his latest contract, professional basketball star Michael James contracted with MacMansion Construction to build a $1 million home for his mother. Home developer Eric Muldoon purchased all of the lots surrounding the lot where James' mother's home would be built, figuring that the James house would increase the value of all of the real estate in the neighborhood. If MacMansion Construction fails to build the home, can Eric Muldoon sue MacMansion?
A. Yes, because he is an intended third-party beneficiary. B. Yes, because he is an incidental beneficiary. C. No, because he is an incidental beneficiary. D. No, because he is an intended third-party beneficiary.
The cover letter can be quite influential in deciding who gets invited for an in-person interview
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.