Define the natural and probable consequences doctrine and discuss the rationale of courts that have rejected the doctrine.
What will be an ideal response?
The natural and probable consequences doctrine states that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for crimes that are the natural and probable outcome of the criminal conduct. Courts that have rejected the doctrine, a minority of them, have done so on the grounds that the doctrine is unfair as applied to an accessory who lacked the intent to commit the more serious offense.
You might also like to view...
The __________ Act criminalized the willful infringement of copyrighted works by electronic means
a. Communications Decency b. No Electronic Theft c. Computer Fraud and Abuse d. Cyber Security Enhancement
The strip search method involves setting up ____________ to be searched by the participants
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Forensic Information System for Handwriting (F.I.S.H.) is a computerized handwriting database used and maintained by the ______________________________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Some researchers believe that if a contagion effect exists, it might be used to counter ______
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word