Jackson Joseph, age 18, and his cousin Noah, age 20, are standing near a convenient store in downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Officer Brooklyn, a twenty-two-year veteran notices the pair loitering around the store and avoiding eye contact with anybody entering and exiting the store. After witnessing these actions for nearly forty-five minutes, Officer Brooklyn moves in to questions the
suspects. Answer the following questions based on the scenario above.If the convenience store employees are later called to the station to identify the suspects based upon speculation of their involvement in the robbery of the store months ago, the suspects have the right to:
A) ?decline being part of the lineup.
B) ?have counsel present.
C) ?have a parent or guardian present.
D) ?nothing; their rights are surrendered.
E) ?represent each other in court.
B
You might also like to view...
Which is the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case that allows police officers to conduct a warrantless search of a person who is subject to parole search conditions even when the sole reason for the search is that the person is on parole?
a. Minnesota v. Murphy b. U. S. v. Knights c. Samson v. California d. Gagnon v. Scarpelli
Some police departments are constrained from using certain selection techniques due to
a. a lack of people to look over the applications b. budgetary restraints c. the size of their agency d. the time frame that they have to conduct the process
A vagrancy statute that provided a definition of loitering as "wandering around from place to place without any visible means of support" would likely be found unconstitutional. Why?
What will be an ideal response?
Local gun courts that deal exclusively with gun law violations reinforce community standards against violence and ensure swift punishment of violators
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false