Explain at least one similarity and one difference between intraobserver and interobserver reliability. Then describe why interobserver reliability may greatly increase our confidence in a measure.
What will be an ideal response?
Both of these types of reliability are attempting to measure the reliability of a measure using an observer, rather than the subjects themselves. Intraobserver reliability is the idea that there was one researcher that observes a phenomenon and finds consistency between two points in time. Interobserver reliability, on the other hand, uses multiple observers to rate the same persons, events, or places. This may greatly increase our confidence between multiples observers rated the phenomenon the same rather than just one observer being reliable. They could have been reliable, but still biased.
You might also like to view...
Police officers are protected from criminal culpability by some sort of a shield that makes them immune from legal responsibilities
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
How do residential substance abuse treatment communities differ from traditional therapeutic communities? What are the components? How does this type of treatment seek to rehabilitate and individual? Do you think this is effective? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
The critical focus of the "smart justice" movement generally is on tough-on-crime laws that, according to its advocates, have caused unjust sentences, mass incarceration, and wasteful spending.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
There is a debate over juveniles and the death penalty. Discuss this debate. Be sure to include Roper v. Simmons (2005). Do you agree with the juvenile death penalty? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?