There are two ways an argument can fail to be a good argument. They are
a. the conclusion does not follow necessarily and a premise is false
b. the conclusion is false and a premise is false
c. the inference is inductively weak and the conclusion does not follow
d. the conclusion does not follow and the premises are not all true
d.
You might also like to view...
In the weeks leading up to an election the media are filled with campaign ads, some of which are emotionally charged and some of which make highly negative claims about candidates for office or propositions on the ballot
A strong critical thinker would be wise to treat all campaign ads as __________. (a) true claims provided by trustworthy experts (b) false and ugly claims made by unethical individuals and organizations (c) cynical attempts to frighten and mislead the voting public (d) sincere attempts to fully and accurately inform the voting public (e) influential manifestations of free speech, which need to be fact-checked
Huemer discusses which of the following arguments for the legalization of drugs
a. Drugs should be outlawed because they cause harm to users. b. Drugs should be outlawed because they harm people other than the user. c. Drugs should be legalized because drug prohibition violates rights. d. All of the above
Endorsements by well-known figures in advertisements are not always fallacious forms of arguing.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
James is best known for his advocacy of the theory of truth known as _________________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word