As an opponent in value argumentation, you have the strategic option of
challenging the advocate's criteria. In using this strategy, which of the following could
you NOT do?
(a) Challenge the advocate's definition of the value object as either including
elements she failed to consider, or excluding elements that she erroneously
included.
(b) Challenge the appropriateness of the advocate's criteria as "good" measures of
effect, significance, and inherency.
(c) Challenge the appropriateness of the advocate's criteria on the basis that they are
too unusual or that they are more appropriate for measuring some other value
object.
(d) Provide better, more appropriate, criteria for measuring the value object.
A
You might also like to view...
Which of the following examples shows the best preparation for an interview?
A. Conchita read an extensive article about the life and times of a well-known rodeo clown. B. Dmitri composed questions based on common knowledge concerning a famous basketball player. C. Susan wrote down notes about what she remembered concerning the star of a 1980s TV show. D. Javier researched a former astronaut by reading many articles about his days in the space shuttle program.
When both logical and emotional appeals don't work, we often try to threaten the other person. This behavior is called
a) verbal aggression b) persuasion. c) seduction. d) physical action.
Correctly identify the acronym (IPAWS)
A. International Press Association Writing Service B. Internal Program And Wiring System C. Integrated Public Alert and Warning System D. both A & C E. none of these answers
When you try to reflect the underlying theme in a statement, you are engaging in
a. judging. b. questioning. c. paraphrasing. d. prompting. e. pseudolistening.