The U.S. Supreme Court has held that although a vehicle stop is a form of seizure, the motorist is not fully protected by the Fourth Amendment. Explain the reasons given by the Supreme Court in this decision. Do you agree? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
A vehicle stop is less intrusive, so neither a warrant nor probable cause is required.
However, some justification (usually reasonable suspicion or something similar) is
required. I agree with this rule. Our expectation of privacy is considerably less than
our expectation of privacy in our homes. Also, the state has an interest in regulating
the operation of motor vehicles on public roads and highways, thus requiring greater
authority in the state and its agents when dealing with vehicles.
You might also like to view...
The rule of thumb typically followed in determining the number of officers needed in the courtroom is which of the following?
a. Two-on-one-plus-one b. One-on-one-plus-one c. One-on-one-plus-two d. Two-on-one-plus-two
Which retailer has changed their hiring policies so that an individual’s criminal history is not raised until the interview?
a. Target b. Walmart c. JCPenney d. Home Depot
Activities that involve transporting individuals from a foreign land into Texas and coercing or deceiving them into forced prostitution or forced labor is known as:
A) human trafficking. B) aggravated peonage. C) strict bondage. D) white slavery.
Who developed the notion that multiple control factors determine human behavior?
A. Francis Ivan Nye B. Travis Hirschi C. Walter Reckless D. Albert Reiss