Discuss the major outcomes of the trials Frye v. United States and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc
What will be an ideal response?
Answer should include points such as the following:
In Frye v. United States, the court ruled that, in order for expert testimony to be admitted at trial, a questioned procedure, technique, or principle must be "generally accepted" by a meaningful segment of the relevant scientific community.
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the U.S. Supreme Court charged the trial judge with ensuring that an expert's testimony rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the case.
You might also like to view...
Many of the causes for employee complaints can be prevented by the supervisor if he consistently adheres to the basic tenets of ________________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Cesare Beccaria ______.
a. was an Italian philosopher who decried harsh punishments for minor offenses b. promoted prison reform based on principles of the Quaker faith c. was a former sheriff and prisoner of war who spent his life focusing on prison reform d. made plans for a hypothetical prison called a panopticon
Victim offender reconciliation often results in secondary offending between the victim and offender
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Research consistently demonstrates that sex offenders have a recidivism rate that is:
A. higher than the rate for all other offender categories. B. lower than the rate for all other offender categories. C. the same as the rate for all other offender categories. D. it is impossible to determine.