Explain how the role of appellate courts handling discretionary appeals differs from their role handling direct appeals
What will be an ideal response?
All states and the federal government have rules that provide for a direct appeal after conviction. The defense drafts the issues to be considered during this process, the prosecution files a responsive brief, and the appellate court rules on each issue. This review is designed to protect the defendant's constitutional rights. Higher courts, whether directly above the initial appellate court or the U. S. Supreme Court, vote on the cases they wish to accept and often select only one issue to review in those cases. At this level the court is considering more than the rights of the individual who filed the appeal. The need to establish precedent, or change existing precedent, is usually the key reason the case is heard. A conflict between lower courts of equal rank is one of the most compelling reasons for granting a hearing.
You might also like to view...
Cybercriminals are using hijacked computers to perform which of the following feats?
A) Spam people B) Steal identities C) Spy on people D) All are being performed
A good report is:
a. ambiguous. b. objective. c. summarized. d. biased. e. none of the above.
According to Mann’s study, in what way does white collar crime defense work differ from conventional crime defense work?
a. Attorneys typically become involved at a later stage of the case b. The control of information becomes a major objective c. Clients are much more likely to be advised to disclose information to the authorities when first questioned d. Attorneys are much less likely to engage in preliminary discussions or negotiations with the government
Juveniles accused of serious offenses, or who have a history of repeated offenses, may be tried as adults
Indicate whether the statement is true or false