What is the difference between accomplice liability and vicarious liability?
What will be an ideal response?
The difference between accomplice liability and vicarious liability lies in the involvement of the perpetrator. Individuals subjected under accomplice liability are those who assist, either materially or psychologically, the commission of a crime. Under the common law, there are four types: principals in the first degree, principals in the second degree, accessories before the fact, and accessories after the fact. Vicarious liability, on the other hand, attaches liability to an individual because of criminal acts committed by another. For instance, employers who benefit from the criminal acts of their employees will be liable under vicarious liability. Students may further discuss the details of accomplice liability and vicarious liability. They may provide examples from the text to supplement their discussion.
You might also like to view...
What are the three basic models used in the states to decide whether and which public sector employees will have collective bargaining rights? How does each of these models operate?
What will be an ideal response
States that permit hypnotically refreshed evidence generally require which of the following?
a. Videotaping of the hypnosis b. Detailed records c. The examination by a qualified hypnotist d. All of the above
Offenders decide whether to commit a crime in a location after they determine which of the following factors:
a. How easy will it be to enter the area? b. How visible, attractive, or vulnerable do targets appear? c. What are the chances of being seen? d. All of the above
What type of evidence tends to make a fact in question more or less probable than it would be without the evidence?
a. Direct b. Circumstantial c. Real d. Relevant