Describe the controversies in the standards movement, including three of the most common criticisms, and two arguments made by advocates of the movement

Question

What will be an ideal response?

Answer 1

First, critics assert, because high-stakes tests focus on math, reading, and science, teachers spend the majority of their time on these subjects and de-emphasize other content areas, such as social studies, art, and music. This narrows the curriculum, deprives students of a well-rounded education, and stifles teacher professionalism and creativity. Second, because the pressure to perform well on high-stakes tests is high, teachers often attempt to transfer out of grades that are tested and schools that face sanctions, and students—and particularly members of cultural minorities—drop out of school rather than face the exams. Third, critics contend that current tests are not adequate for making crucial decisions about students' lives, and high-stakes tests have negative effects on both student motivation and learning.
Advocates of testing, while conceding that teacher preparation, instructional resources, and the tests themselves need to be improved, argue that these tests are the fairest and most effective means of promoting success for all students. Advocates also argue that evidence indicates that educational systems that require content standards and use tests that thoroughly measure the extent to which the standards are met greatly improve the achievement for all students, including those from disadvantaged backgrounds.