If an offered piece of evidence is objected to as irrelevant, what should the court do before ruling on the objection?
A. Nothing — the court will rule immediately before allowing the testimony to continue.
B. require an offer of proof from the party offering the evidence demonstrating the relevance of the testimony
C. allow the testimony and let the jury decide whether it is relevant or not
D. sustain the objection
B. require an offer of proof from the party offering the evidence demonstrating the relevance of the testimony
You might also like to view...
Matching
1. Practical imperative a. It guides all conduct. 2. Duties and inclinations b. A person can never be used as a means to an end. 3. Hypothetical imperatives c. Kant criticized this. 4. Kingdom of ends d. Is not a possession. 5. Justification for lying e. Non-consequentialist approach, known as formalism. 6. The Golden Rule f. Deontological ethics is also known as this. 7. Truth g. Potential consequences of your truthfulness should never be used for this purpose. 8. Formalism h. An ideal state in which rational beings are united through common, objective universal laws that apply to everyone. 9. Categorical imperative i. Similar to Aristotle's apparent goods. 10. Deontological ethics j. Kant distinguishes between these, one having no moral worth and the other is what one ought to do.
Frankie has given Sally – a "Mickey Finn" what are those two drug combinations?
a. secobarbital and amobarbital b. chloral hydrate and alcohol c. heroin and amphetamine d. any two barbiturates
A jury is a panel of judges selected according to law and sworn to determine matters of fact in a criminal case and deliver a verdict of guilty or not guilty.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
The wild _____ test, developed in the thirteenth century, was among the first methods used to determine insanity
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).