State whether the following item expresses moral value or nonmoral value; or no value at all.The Pittsburgh Steelers were the best football team of the 1970s, and the Forty-Niners were the team of the '80s. The Redskins were the best of the '90s. But the Patriots will turn out to be the best of the 2000s.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Nonmoral value.
You might also like to view...
If we take de Beauvoir's ethical observations seriously, it is obvious that it is always wrong to lie
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Explain why female circumcision can be justified in countries where female circumcision is common. A. Female circumcision can be justified so that a woman will be eligible formarriage since people may have no alternative but to adhere to the practicebecause the consequence (ineligibility for marriage) for not engaging wouldbe worse than the practice itself
B. Female circumcision can be justified so that a woman will have reducedsexual pleasure since people may have no alternative but to adhere to thepractice because the consequence (sexual pleasure) for not engaging wouldbe worse than the practice itself. C. Female circumcision can be justified so that a woman will be spiritually closer to God and better able to get into heaven. The consequence (not getting into heaven) for failure to perform this practice would be worse than engaging in it. D. Female circumcision can be justified so that a woman will be adequately prepared for the pain of childbirth.
What does eudaimonia mean?
a. it is synonym for Aristotle's final cause or teleology. In humans, the telos (final cause) is to flourish according to the formal cause or the nature of human beings b. it is the Ancient Greek word for virtue. Virtues are positive character traits, and vices are negative traits c. the "activity of the soul in accordance with arete (virtue)" so the eudaimonia (happy) life is the life of virtue. It is not like the American notion of "happiness" but a deeper notion of flourishing for humans d. it is the Ancient Greek word for wisdom. This is the knowledge born from the experience of life. While an eighteen year old might know the basic rules of morality in society, it takes a person of experience to know how to apply them in different scenarios. It takes a person of practical wisdom.
Using only rules from Group I, provide a deductive proof demonstrating the validity of the following:1. P ? M (Premise)2. ~M v ~Q (Premise)3. S ? Q (Premise)4. (~P v ~S) ? R (Premise)/? R
What will be an ideal response?