Explain the principle of retribution and how it differs from revenge.
What will be an ideal response?
Answers will vary. The oldest and most common justification for punishing someone is that he or she "deserved it"-as the Old Testament states, "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." Retribution is the philosophy that those who commit criminal acts should be punished for breaking society's rules to the extent required by just deserts. The principle of just deserts holds that the severity of the punishment must be in proportion to the severity of the crime. Retributive justice is not the same as revenge. Retribution is more concerned with the needs of society as a whole, whereas revenge implies that a wrongdoer is punished only with the aim of satisfying a victim or victims.
You might also like to view...
Working as a probation or parole officer is attractive because of the small caseloads and several opportunities for career mobility
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
According to utilitarianism, the morality of an act is determined, by the __________it brings, compared with other alternative actions
A. knowledge. B. pleasure. C. consequences. D. controversy. E. None of the above.
The vast majority of robberies are conducted by ______ offenders.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
What's the difference between historical biological and contemporary biosocial theories of crime?
What will be an ideal response?