Forming a hypothesis before observing the evidence...
A. is better when possible because it helps us avoid ad hoc modification
B. offers no benefit because there's no flowchart for science and sometimes we observe the evidence and then forming a hypothesis about it
C. is worse than making the observation and then forming a hypothesis, because the latter allows us to modify our hypotheses in order to better explain the evidence
D. offers no benefit because, whichever order we do things in, we can still isolate the strength of the evidence from the prior probability of the theory.
Answer: A. is better when possible because it helps us avoid ad hoc modification
You might also like to view...
For the following, try to come up with an additional premise that will turn the passage into a deductively valid or an inductively strong argument. Usually this requires adding a general moral principle and, sometimes, an extra nonmoral claim as well. The idea is to guarantee that the "ought" claim follows from the "is" claim.When Sarah bought the lawn mower from Jean, she promised to pay another fifty dollars on the first of the month. Since it's now the first, Sarah should pay Jean the money.
What will be an ideal response?
INSTRUCTIONS: Select the best translation for each categorical proposition. All books except novels are boring to read
A) No novels are books boring to read. B) All books boring to read are books that are not novels. C) Some novels are not books boring to read. D) All books that are not boring to read are books that are novels. E) No novels are books boring to read, and all books that are not novels are books boring to read.
The principle of universalizability does not account for the immorality of
a. principled fanatics. b. slavery. c. lying. d. cheating on one's taxes.
Identify for which claims, if any, support has been given in the following passage; and state in your own words the reasons that have been offered for these claims."What is the best move to begin a game [of chess]? At one time the masters began automatically with 1 P-K4; then they switched to 1 P-Q4. Paul Morphy, considered by many critics the greatest chess genius that ever lived, never played 1 P-Q4. In contrast, Ernest Gruenfeld, one of the greatest living authorities on opening play, ventured on 1 P-K4 only once in his entire tournament career (against Capablanca at Karlsbad 1929). When asked why he avoided 1 P-K4, he answered, 'I never make a mistake in the opening.'"-Irving Chernev and Fred Reinfeld, The Fireside Book of Chess
What will be an ideal response?