What statement expresses the consequences of Edwards Aquifer Authority v. Buttell Day and Joel McDaniel?
a. The Texas Supreme Court sided with the advocates of private property rights
b. The Texas Supreme Court ruled that although the state was entitled to regulate the use of groundwater, its rules in this particular case were unreasonable.
c. The court did not leave any clear guidelines as to what kind of regulations are "reasonable," so public agencies do not know what they can and cannot do.
d. The court ensured that the future of water regulation in Texas will be confusing, uncertain, and full of lawsuits.
e. All of these are consequences of this decision.
e
You might also like to view...
A primary characteristic of government is that it __________.
A. is incapable of regulating the use of legitimate force in a society B. is always democratic C. is rarely coercive D. alone regulates the use of legitimate force in society
In the decision of McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court found that states
a. do not have the power to tax institutions of the federal government but may place restrictions on Congress. b. do not have the power to tax institutions of the federal government or otherwise place restrictions on Congress. c. have the power to tax institutions of the federal government and otherwise place restrictions on Congress. d. have the power to tax institutions, but do not have power to place restrictions on Congress.
According to the text, that portion of the American public who oppose "cooperative internationalism" and oppose "militant internationalism" can be described as
a. internationalists. b. accommodationists. c. post-cold war internationalists. d. isolationists. e. hardliners.
Define public policy.
What will be an ideal response?