In terms of pragmatics, describe the study of contextual rules. Provide examples to illustrate your description
Please provide the best answer for the statement.
Answer: Contextual rules are rules that, no matter what language or dialect is spoken, govern a person’s use of language depending on the communication situation. For example, telling jokes and laughing at a party is typically acceptable, whereas those same jokes and laughing might be interpreted negatively in a courtroom or at a funeral. One challenge for pragmatics scholars, then, is uncovering the implicit communication rules that govern different settings. Communication pragmatics also vary by culture. For example, in some houses of worship, appropriate verbal behavior involves talking quietly or not all, acting subdued, and listening without responding—but in others, people applaud, sing exuberantly, and respond loudly with exclamations like “Amen!” Neither set of communication rules is “right”; each is appropriate to its own setting and cultural context. Moreover, speakers differ in the ways they use language to communicate, the ways they enunciate their words, and how they present their ideas. For example, Southerners “drawl” their vowels, whereas New Englanders drop the r after theirs; some speakers are extremely direct, and others are not.
You might also like to view...
What are French and Raven?s Five Bases of Power?
What will be an ideal response?
According to the Impact / Society box, “Excerpts from the 1943 Code of Wartime Practices for American Broadcasters,” which of the following was not censored by the Office of War Information?
a. weather forecasts b. quiz programs c. reports of troop movements d. situation comedies
How is family conflict different from other forms of conflict?
A. It can be easily avoided. B. It simply can't be as easily avoided. C. It simply is about control. D. It can get ugly.
Running two episodes of the same series back to back is an example of
a. tentpoling. b. hammocking. c. anchoring. d. doubling.