What must a defendant prove before he or she can allege that a plaintiff impliedly assumed the risk?
What will be an ideal response?
A plaintiff is said to have impliedly assumed the risk when his or her conduct shows that the plaintiff was aware of the risk in question and voluntarily agreed to bear that risk. For this principle to be applicable the plaintiff must actually be aware of the particular risk in question. It is not enough that the plaintiff merely should have known of the risk involved. The plaintiff must also voluntarily consent to the risk. Consent is not voluntary if the plaintiff had no reasonable choice but to confront a danger.
You might also like to view...
Quitclaiming half interest in real property to a spouse can transform a separate piece of property into a marital asset.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
With a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, the couple can expect to have their bankruptcy case processed within three to five years, so filing for bankruptcy jointly pre-divorce may not be advantageous.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
A paralegal working for a sole practitioner would not handle which of the following tasks?
A. Bookkeeping B. Providing legal advice to clients C. Interviewing clients and witnesses D. Conducting investigations
What is the difference between oppositions and cancellations??
What will be an ideal response?