For a wireless network with integrated services, e.g., including both voice and data applications, there are two basic channel allocation schemes: Complete Sharing (CS) and Complete Partitioning (CP). The CS policy allows all users equal access to the channels available at all times. The CP policy, on the other hand, divides up the available bandwidth into separate sub-pools according to user type. Compare both the advantages and disadvantages of these two schemes.
What will be an ideal response?
The advantages of CS for integrated services are: efficient bandwidth utilization
and reduce the total call blocking probability. The disadvantage of CS for
integrated services is that when data traffic is heavy, the blocking probability of
voice calls will be increased. The advantage of CP for integrated service is that
the QoS for voice can be easily supported, as data traffic does not influence the
blocking probability of voice calls. But, the unused bandwidth in each category
will be wasted.
You might also like to view...
The total of the schedule of values is the contract amount.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
As the percentage of carbon increases, the tensile strength increases, the hardness increases, and ductility is reduced.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Which of the following statements regarding chillers is TRUE?
A) Dry (direct expansion) chillers require less refrigerant than do flooded chillers. B) Flooded chillers have less potential for freeze-ups than other chillers. C) Regional zone chillers are more cost-effective than centralized units. D) Top-loaded chillers do not use shell-and-tube arrangements.
Given the signal f(t) = 4 e^(-t) u(t), what is the total energy in f(t)?
What will be an ideal response?