Why should a company be concerned about integrating communications from different sources within the company?
What will be an ideal response?
Customers may not separate conflicting or varying messages from different sources within a company, so failing to integrate communications could confuse customers or influence them in ways the marketers had not intended.
You might also like to view...
A chi-square analysis is the examination of frequencies for two metric variables in a cross-tabulation table to determine whether the variables have a significant relationship
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Johanna is excellent at applying tax law and other accounting principles in her job as a manager in her accounting firm. She has equally high skills in working with the employees she supervises but does not have as much skill in helping the firm shape the vision for growth. Applying Katz’s skills model, at what level of management is Johanna?
A. top management B. middle management C. supervisory management D. CEO management
Which of the following has developed because existing retail institutions are inadequately fulfilling market needs?
a. consumer cooperatives b. independent channel ownership c. leased departments d. total vertical integration
Product Liability. In January 1999, John Clark of Clarksdale, Mississippi, bought a paintball gun. Clark practiced with the gun and knew how to screw in the CO cartridge, pump the gun, and use its safety and trigger. He hunted and had taken a course in
hunter safety education. He knew that protective eyewear was available for purchase, but he chose not to buy it. Clark also understood that it was "common sense" not to shoot anyone in the face. Chris Rico, another Clarksdale resident, owned a paintball gun made by Brass Eagle, Inc Rico was similarly familiar with the gun's use and its risks. At that time and place, Clark, Rico, and their friends played a game that involved shooting paintballs at cars whose occupants also had the guns. One night, while Clark and Rico were cruising with their guns, Rico shot at Clark's car but hit Clark in the eye. Clark filed a suit in a Mississippi state court against Brass Eagle to recover for the injury, alleging in part that its gun was defectively designed. During the trial, Rico testified that his gun "never malfunctioned." In whose favor should the court rule? Why?