What conflicting visions did Americans offer in response to the expansionist drives of Germany and Japan? How did these visions influence the American path to war?
What will be an ideal response?
American interventionists wanted to use military force to restrain German and Japanese imperialism. American non-interventionists thought that the purpose of the U.S. military was national defense and that what one foreign country did to another is not a U.S. concern. American policy remained non-interventionist, but the U.S. tried to use a military buildup as a warning to Japan's aggression. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was a response to this buildup, and America's entry into the war was a response to this attack.
You might also like to view...
What is machinima?
What will be an ideal response?
Rutherford B. Hayes was nominated for the presidency because of his reputation for
A) favoring an inflationary monetary policy. B) getting bribes and offices for his supporters. C) political glamour and charisma. D) being honest and moderate.
The majority of the terrorists who carried out the 11 September 2001 attack on the United States were from
A. Afghanistan. B. Iran. C. Iraq. D. Saudi Arabia. E. Jordan.
After the __________were pushed back to Iraq and Iran and converted to Islam, the Mamluks were able to terminate the Crusader Kingdom in 1291 with the conquest of Acre.
a. Seljuks b. Marinids c. Mongols d. Fatimids