Trein, Inc. entered into a one-year, $1 million contract with Mia, a sports celebrity, to promote Trein's products. E-presto Inc., a competitor of Trein, was interested in having Mia promote its products but knew of her contract with Trein. E-presto offered Mia a three-year, $5 million contract. Mia left Trein and signed with E-presto. If Trein sues E-presto for tortious interference with a contract, E-presto
A. will be able to establish a justification since E-presto was acting to protect an existing economic interest.
B. will be able to establish a justification because, in talking to Mia, E-presto was exercising its First Amendment freedom of speech.
C. will be able to establish a justification because to decide otherwise would subject Mia to involuntary servitude.
D. will not be able to establish a justification.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
In an auction without reserve, the seller is the offeree
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
When a pronoun is the subject of a verb, the pronoun must be nominative
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Declaration of a cash dividend results in a liability being recorded.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Which of the following is not a factor that has caused the decline in defined benefit plans in the U.S.?
A) Increasing mobility of the workforce B) Global competition causing employers to reduce expenses C) Reduced employer liability for pension plan results under a defined benefit plan D) Employee, and not the employer, bears the investment risk of a defined contribution plan