In Missouri v. Baumruk (2002), Baumruk won a new trial because:
a. he was incompetent to stand trial because of a brain injury
b. the judge called him "a no good killer" in front of the jury
c. his trial was held where Baumruk had committed his crimes
d. the prosecutor re-enacted the killing in slow motion for the jury
C
You might also like to view...
What was one of the ways that community-era reformers attempted to improve relationships with citizens and ensure citizen satisfaction?
A) increased car patrols B) created more jail cells C) reduced police presence D) increased foot patrols
Describe Hirschi's four elements of the social bond
What will be an ideal response?
A 20-year-old man has sexual intercourse with a 16-year-old girl who consents because they are boy- and girl friend. What offense, if any, was committed?
a. Assault b. Sexual assault c. Aggravated assault d. Aggravated sexual assault e. No offense
A(n) _________ is an individualized, written document that clarifies how each court-ordered condition is to be fulfilled by the offender and the supervising officer in the context of the risks and needs posed
a. collateral contact b. case plan c. PSI d. LSI-R