How did the United Nations differ from the League of Nations?
A) There was no difference on paper; the United Nations did have the power to support physical sanctions.
B) Unlike the League of Nations, the United Nations was neither based on the premise of collective security, nor was it to act a world police force.
C) The United Nations was a stronger entity because it avoided the premise of governance.
D) The United Nations could act collectively, where the League could not.
E) The United Nations was based upon the understanding that every nation was granted automatic membership to prevent the revolving door of the League.
B
You might also like to view...
What did the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff conclude about Korea as early as 1947?
a. It had to be liberated at all cost. b. It had little strategic value to the United States. c. The South Korean regime was perfectly capable of protecting itself. d. The North Korean regime was suppressing a revolutionary uprising
According to neoconservatives of the 1970s, one of America´s greatest problems was
a. the lack of a social safety net. b. the degradation of the environment. c. big government. d. excessive military spending. e. lack of equal opportunity.
By 1811 it was clear that the outcome of the American Revolution had been ________ for Indians living in the new republic.
A. detrimental B. disastrous C. beneficial D. of no significance
What financial development during this era greatly expanded the amount of money in circulation but also made banking much riskier?
A) the printing of paper currency, bank notes, that were backed by gold and silver deposits B) banks making loans to businessmen and investors and collecting interest on those loans C) the entrance into the banking profession of political cronies, rampant speculators, and unrepentant criminals D) the issuing of bank notes, not only on the gold and silver deposits the banks held, but also on the loans in their portfolio